<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classified: Everyone has their eye off the ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/</link>
	<description>In Zion We Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:52:48 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: saus</title>
		<link>http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/#comment-93507</link>
		<dc:creator>saus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/#comment-93507</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Welcome fellow Hotair / Malkin readers - Please feel at home..&lt;/b&gt;

Yesterday AllahP had a headline about Olmert ingratiating himself to Syria by offering what seemed like an odd thing in retrospect, dialog at any time for peace. That does seem odd since it was his first statement about Syria since the alleged bombing.

Mulling it over, if Israel happened to have maybe in actuality bombed Iran &amp; North Korea - just on Syrian territory, that statement makes a tiny bit more sense. Of course it&#039;s still wacky, but somewhat less wacky than such an offer to a country who&#039;s nuke program you just bombed outright.

A curious addition to the speculation fest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span id="co_93507"><p><b>Welcome fellow Hotair / Malkin readers &#8211; Please feel at home..</b></p>
<p>Yesterday AllahP had a headline about Olmert ingratiating himself to Syria by offering what seemed like an odd thing in retrospect, dialog at any time for peace. That does seem odd since it was his first statement about Syria since the alleged bombing.</p>
<p>Mulling it over, if Israel happened to have maybe in actuality bombed Iran &#038; North Korea &#8211; just on Syrian territory, that statement makes a tiny bit more sense. Of course it&#8217;s still wacky, but somewhat less wacky than such an offer to a country who&#8217;s nuke program you just bombed outright.</p>
<p>A curious addition to the speculation fest.</p>
</span><div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('93507','saus');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('93507','saus');" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: British intel outfit reports evidence of chemical warheads on Syrian missiles</title>
		<link>http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/#comment-93464</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good news: British intel outfit reports evidence of chemical warheads on Syrian missiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hashmonean.com/2007/09/18/classified-everyone-has-their-eye-off-the-ball/#comment-93464</guid>
		<description>[...] Could this have had anything to do with Israel&#8217;s mystery raid on Syria two weeks ago? Bret Stephens has a worthy analysis in today&#8217;s Opinion Journal of the unprecedented secrecy with which details of the operation are being guarded. The target must have been very, very precious, he concludes, which points towards some sort of nuclear material. Your exit question, per the dot-connectin&#8217; Hashmonean: Assuming it was nuclear and was, per reports, delivered from North Korea in the guise of a cement shipment, why should we believe it was intended for Syria as opposed to Syria&#8217;s latest investor in, ahem, &#8220;cement factories&#8221;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could this have had anything to do with Israel&#8217;s mystery raid on Syria two weeks ago? Bret Stephens has a worthy analysis in today&#8217;s Opinion Journal of the unprecedented secrecy with which details of the operation are being guarded. The target must have been very, very precious, he concludes, which points towards some sort of nuclear material. Your exit question, per the dot-connectin&#8217; Hashmonean: Assuming it was nuclear and was, per reports, delivered from North Korea in the guise of a cement shipment, why should we believe it was intended for Syria as opposed to Syria&#8217;s latest investor in, ahem, &#8220;cement factories&#8221;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
