<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC &#8211; Habitually downplays Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/</link>
	<description>In Zion We Trust</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: saus</title>
		<link>http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>saus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;haha... You are unbelievably correct Gavriel, I didn&#039;t look at it in that way. May as well indeed, those bbc brit bastards - imho out of control.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230; You are unbelievably correct Gavriel, I didn&#8217;t look at it in that way. May as well indeed, those bbc brit bastards &#8211; imho out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AbbaGav</title>
		<link>http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>AbbaGav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hashmonean.com/2006/06/02/bbc-habitually-downplays-iran/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Since &quot;4-9 years is less than 10 years&quot; is sufficient justification, why don&#039;t they just say &quot;within 50 to 100 years?&quot;&#160; They seem to be carefully calibrating what they can get away with.&#160; &#160;Reminds me of the stores that offer discounts of &quot;up to 50%,&quot; which to me makes only one verifiable assertion --&#160;that you will not find a discount of more than 50% in the store; it promises nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since &quot;4-9 years is less than 10 years&quot; is sufficient justification, why don&#8217;t they just say &quot;within 50 to 100 years?&quot;&nbsp; They seem to be carefully calibrating what they can get away with.&nbsp; &nbsp;Reminds me of the stores that offer discounts of &quot;up to 50%,&quot; which to me makes only one verifiable assertion &#8211;&nbsp;that you will not find a discount of more than 50% in the store; it promises nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

